Předvánoční ústavněprávní orgie v Mexico City
Níže připojuji program VIII. Světového kongresu Mezinárodní asociace ústavního práva, který se bude konat ve dnech 5-10. prosince 2010 v Mexico City. Program je velmi bohatý. Namátkou vybírám workshopy o principu proporcionality, federalismu, dělbě moci či metodologii srovnávacího ústavního práva. Pokud jde o sestavu "speakerů", ta je rovněž impresivní. Mezi přednášejícími najdeme jména jako Aharon Barak, Ran Hirschl, Vicki Jackson, Andras Sajó, Lech Garlicki, Michel Rosenfeld, Guy Canivet, Jutta Limbach, Cheryl Saunders, Victor Fererras Comella, Michel Troper či Bruce Ackermann. Jak vidno, destinace je to sice vzdálená, ale určitě to bude stát za to.
A teď ten slíbený program:
SUNDAY 5 DECEMBER 2010
Registration of participants
18:00
Meeting of the Executive Committee of the IACL
20:00
Welcome reception for the IACL members
MONDAY 6 DECEMBER 2010
8:15 - 9:30
Registration of participants
9:30 - 12:00
Opening session
Opening statements from host country representatives
President of the organising committee
President of the IACL
President of the IACL programme commission
13:00
Lunch
Afternoon session
15:00 - 17:30
Plenary Session I
Philosophical perspectives on principles in constitutional law
Principles increasingly have a prominent place in constitutional law and constitutional discourse. Principles can be defined at a very abstract level but also applied in a very specific context. Often principles are referred to as norms that are valid within a normative system as a whole, rather than characterized by a specific scope of application. Hence, they can be identified in all normative systems, including in law, morality, theology etc. How can principles be distinguished from other types of norms, or from empirical statements that are relevant for the application of norms? What is the relationship between principles, values, rules, policies and facts? What can lawyers learn from philosophers about the nature of principles and the methods of resolving conflicts or tensions between them?
Chair:
Carla Huerta
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
Panellists:
Leslie Green
Balliol College, Oxford University
Michel Troper
Université Paris X - Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
Ulrich Preuss
Freie Universität Berlin
Bruce Ackerman
Yale Law School
Samantha Besson
University of Fribourg, Switzerland
TUESDAY 7 DECEMBER 2010
Morning session
9:30 - 13:00
Coffee break 11:00 - 11:30
Workshops
1. Electoral systems and constitutional principles *
Chairs:
Manuel González Oropeza
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
Christina Murray
University of Cape Town
Nadia Bernoussi
École Nationale d'Administration, Rabat
2. Old authoritarian constitutions and new democratic systems *
Chairs:
Ana Laura Magaloni
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), México
Slobodan Milacic
Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux IV
Gianni Buquicchio
President of the Venice Commission (Conseil de l’Europe)
3. Media and Constitutional Principles
Chairs:
Cesare Pinelli
Università di Roma ‘La Sapienza’
Yasuo Hasebe
University of Tokyo
4. Divided societies and constitutional principles
Chairs:
Iain Currie
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Rohan Edrisinha
Centre for Policy Alternatives, Sri Lanka
5. Subnational constitutions
Chairs:
Mo Jihong
Law Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
Robert Williams
Rutgers University School of Law
Francis Delpérée
Université Catholique de Louvain la Neuve
6. The rule of law in the age of terrorism
Chairs:
Martin Scheinin
European University Institute, Florence
Suzi Navot
Collège de Droit, Rishon Letsyon, Israel
13:00
Lunch
Afternoon session
14:30 - 17:00
Plenary session II:
Constitutional law and the generation and use of principles
How do principles operate within constitutional law? What is the role of principles in diverse legal traditions such as common law, civil law, customary and other legal traditions? What is the notion and role of 'the people' in the creation, modification and overriding of constitutional principles?
Chair:
Cheryl Saunders
University of Melbourne
Panellists:
Michel Rosenfeld
Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, New York
Diego Valadés
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
Yu Xingzhong
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Victor Ferreres
Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona
Armin von Bogdandy
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, Heidelberg
WEDNESDAY 8 DECEMBER 2010
Morning session
9:30 - 13:00
Coffee break 11:00 - 11:30
Workshops
7. Multiculturalism and indigenous peoples’ rights *
Chairs:
Menaka Guruswamy
Avocat, New Delhi
Ghislain Otis
Université d'Ottawa
Francisco Ibarra Palafox
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
8. Is Federalism a Constitutional Principle? *
Chairs:
Vicki Jackson
Georgetown University School of Law
Olivier Beaud
Université de Paris II - Panthéon-Assas
José María Serna de la Garza
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
9. Proportionality as a principle
Chairs:
Rodrigo Uprimny
Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá
Bertrand Mathieu
Université de Paris 1 - Panthéon-Sorbonne
10. Indivisibility of human rights
Chairs:
Julia Iliopoulos-Strangas
Université d’Athènes
Cho Byung-Yoon
Myongji University, Seoul
11. Religion and the State
Chairs:
Susanna Mancini
Università di Bologna
Michel Rosenfeld
Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University, New York
12. Foreign law: jurisprudence crossfertilization
Chairs:
Tania Groppi
Università di Siena
Marie-Claire Ponthoreau
Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV
13:00
Lunch
Afternoon session
14:00 - 17:00
MEETINGS OF RESEARCH GROUPS AND REGIONAL GROUPS
For your information, certain thematic meetings for groups from different regions of the world have been planned prior to the program. Other registered participants are welcome to call similar meetings. Given that some of these meetings will be carried out informally, these activities will not be included in program.
14:00 - 15:45
European Network of Constitutional Lawyers
Workshop on ‘Values in the jurisprudence of the constitutional courts of central and eastern Europe’
Chairs:
Rainer Arnold
University of Regensburg
Evgenyj Tanchev
Cour Constitutionnelle de Bulgarie
16:00 - 18:45
Meeting of the Council of the IACL
THURSDAY 9 DECEMBER 2010
Morning session
9:30 - 13:00
Coffee break 11:00 - 11:30
Plenary Sesssion III
Principles: universal, particular?
To what extent do constitutional principles make a claim of universality, in time and space? Can constitutional principles with presumed universal validity be identified with universal human rights and peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens)? Can principles be absolute? Are principles converging or diverging? Do universal principles provide a solution to the challenges of particularism and legal pluralism in multicultural societies?
Chair:
Claude Klein
Hebrew University, Jerusalem
Panellists:
Ayelet Shachar
University of Toronto
Sandy Liebenberg
Stellenbosch University
Pratap Mehta
Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi
Slim Laghmani
Faculté des Sciences Juridiques, Politiques et Sociales de Tunis
Hilary Charlesworth
The Australian National University College of Law
13:00
Lunch
Afternoon session
14:30 - 17:00
Workshops
13. New trends in Latin American Constitutional Law *
Chairs:
Miguel Carbonell
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas de la UNAM
Giuseppe De Vergottini
Università di Bologna
Marcelo Figueiredo
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo
14. The principle of separation of powers reviewed *
Chairs:
Charles Fombad
University of Pretoria
Eivind Smith
Université d’Oslo
Antonio María Hernández
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba
15. The impact of international law on constitutional principles
Chairs:
Raul Pangalangan
University of the Philippines
Ibrahim Kaboğlu
Université de Marmara
16. Constitutional Principles and democratic transition
Chairs:
Javier Couso
Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago
Lech Garlicki
Judge of the European Court of Human Rights
17. How comparative is comparative constitutional law?
Chairs:
Ran Hirschl
University of Toronto
Constance Grewe
Université de Strasbourg
18. Constitutional implications of regional integration
Chairs:
Daniel Sabsay
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Rainer Grote
Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht
Thomas Fleiner
Université de Fribourg, Suisse
FRIDAY 10 DECEMBER 2010
Morning session
9:30 - 13:00
Coffee break 11:00 - 11:30
Plenary session IV
Constitutional Principles and the Judge
To compare deductive traditions of deriving supra- or meta-constitutional principles from the values behind or above the written Constitution with inductive traditions of identifying common principles in individual cases and gradually recognizing their constitutional nature. Do courts refer to principles? Is there commonality in the judicial use of principles, or can we develop a typology of clearly distinct ways of referring to principles? What are the constitutional principles most often referred to by judges? What is the degree of cross-fertilization between legal systems when referring to principles?
Chair:
Andras Sajó
Judge of the European Court of Human Rights
Panellists:
José Ramón Cossío
Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of Justice of Mexico
Aharon Barak
Former President of the Supreme Court of Israel
Jutta Limbach
Former President of the German Federal Constitutional Court
Babacar Kanté
Vice-President of the Constitutional Court of Senegal
Sian Elias
Chief Justice of New Zealand
Guy Canivet
Membre du Conseil Constitutionnel de la République Française
Closing Session
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat