Odkaz na pár zajímavostí se soutěžně-právní tématikou.
1/ Zajímavý post na Chilling competition, k přehledu pokut za kartely v roce 2014.
2/ Článek od David S. Evanse na téma The Antitrust Analysis of Rules and Standards for Software Platforms. Přínosné čtení zejm. pro zájemce o problematiku multi-sided platforem.
Abstract následuje: Software platforms anchor vast global communities of users, application developers, device manufacturers, content providers, advertisers, and others. They drive innovation by enabling entrepreneurs, often anywhere in the world, to develop “applications” and to reach all the users of the platform, often anywhere in the world. These applications are sometimes the foundation of substantial businesses. The value of these software platforms, and their ability to support large communities, depends on the ability of the platform to promote positive externalities and reduce negative externalities. Software platforms usually impose rules and standards and often exclude, or bounce, participants that harm others in the community, and reward participants that benefit others in the community. Competition policy should presume that these governance systems, and the restrictions they place on platform participants including their possible expulsion from the platform, are efficient and pro-competitive. Software platforms could, however, employ governance systems to foreclose competition. These restrictions, therefore, should not be lawful per se. Rather, courts and competition authorities should employ screens to protect pro-competitive restrictions and isolate anti-competitive ones. The application of these screens should be neutral to the licensing model chosen by the software platform creator. There is, in particular, no basis for imposing tougher limitations on software platforms that use an open-source license model than on software platforms that use a proprietary license.
3/ Rozsudek Tribunálu ve věci T-251/11 République d’Autriche contre Commission européenne ze dne 11.12.2014 k problematice aplikace unijního práva veřejné podpory v oblasti podpory výroby elektřiny z obnovitelných zdrojů.
4/ Zvláštní číslo e-Competitions Bulletinu k tématu veřejné podpory v energetice (subscription required).
1/ Zajímavý post na Chilling competition, k přehledu pokut za kartely v roce 2014.
2/ Článek od David S. Evanse na téma The Antitrust Analysis of Rules and Standards for Software Platforms. Přínosné čtení zejm. pro zájemce o problematiku multi-sided platforem.
Abstract následuje: Software platforms anchor vast global communities of users, application developers, device manufacturers, content providers, advertisers, and others. They drive innovation by enabling entrepreneurs, often anywhere in the world, to develop “applications” and to reach all the users of the platform, often anywhere in the world. These applications are sometimes the foundation of substantial businesses. The value of these software platforms, and their ability to support large communities, depends on the ability of the platform to promote positive externalities and reduce negative externalities. Software platforms usually impose rules and standards and often exclude, or bounce, participants that harm others in the community, and reward participants that benefit others in the community. Competition policy should presume that these governance systems, and the restrictions they place on platform participants including their possible expulsion from the platform, are efficient and pro-competitive. Software platforms could, however, employ governance systems to foreclose competition. These restrictions, therefore, should not be lawful per se. Rather, courts and competition authorities should employ screens to protect pro-competitive restrictions and isolate anti-competitive ones. The application of these screens should be neutral to the licensing model chosen by the software platform creator. There is, in particular, no basis for imposing tougher limitations on software platforms that use an open-source license model than on software platforms that use a proprietary license.
3/ Rozsudek Tribunálu ve věci T-251/11 République d’Autriche contre Commission européenne ze dne 11.12.2014 k problematice aplikace unijního práva veřejné podpory v oblasti podpory výroby elektřiny z obnovitelných zdrojů.
4/ Zvláštní číslo e-Competitions Bulletinu k tématu veřejné podpory v energetice (subscription required).
Díky, Jirko! Zaujímavý je tiež rozsudok Tribunálu vo veci T-201/11 Si.mobil, týkajúci sa vertikálnej deľby moci vo vymáhaní kartelov. Komisia prvýkrát odmietla pustiť sa do vyšetrovania kartelu, pretože sa vecou už zaoberal slovinský protimonopolný úrad. Tribunál rozhodnutie Komisie podporil a súhlasil, že predmetný kartel nemá dostatočný euro-rozmer, aby sa ním Komisia zaoberala. Významný krok k decentralizácii vymáhania súťažného práva, IMHO.
OdpovědětVymazathttp://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:62011TJ0201&rid=1
Díky za upozornění. :-)
OdpovědětVymazat